Detecting Sandwich Attacks in Ethereum with PoSGasTrace

Table of Contents

Ethereum is one of the largest decentralized platforms, renowned for its openness and transactional transparency. These qualities, while fostering a robust and innovative ecosystem, also expose it to exploitation by malicious entities. One such exploitation is the sandwich attack, which manipulates the Automated Market Maker (AMM) mechanism to profit from front-running and back-running transactions. To combat this, we introduce GasTrace, a framework designed to detect and mitigate sandwich attacks by analyzing various transaction features, particularly focusing on Gas features.

I. General View

Background and Motivation

Importance of Ethereum’s Openness and Transparency

Ethereum, as one of the leading decentralized platforms, has revolutionized the way transactions and smart contracts are executed. Its openness and transparency are fundamental characteristics that have contributed to its widespread adoption and trust among users. These features allow for public verification of transactions and ensure that the system operates without centralized control, fostering innovation and participation from a diverse community.

However, these same attributes that promote transparency and trust also present significant security challenges. Every transaction on Ethereum is publicly visible, making it easier for malicious actors to analyze and exploit this information. While transparency is essential for trust and verification, it also means that any vulnerability or exploitable aspect is open for potential abuse.

Exploitation by Malicious Entities

The openness of Ethereum makes it a prime target for various malicious activities. Attackers can analyze transaction patterns, identify vulnerabilities, and execute strategies that exploit the system for financial gain. One of the most sophisticated and damaging forms of exploitation is the sandwich attack, which targets the transaction ordering mechanism of Ethereum to manipulate market prices.

If you're wondering how to strengthen Ethereum security, we recently wrote a post about it: "Strengthening Ethereum PoS: Strategies Against Byzantine Attacks."

Sandwich Attacks: How They Work

Mechanism of Sandwich Attacks

A sandwich attack is a type of front-running and back-running strategy that manipulates the Automated Market Maker (AMM) mechanism. Here’s how it typically works:

1. Front-Running: The attacker places a buy order just before a large pending transaction. This increases the price of the asset due to the increased demand.

2. Back-Running: Immediately after the large transaction is executed, the attacker places a sell order to capitalize on the higher price caused by their initial buy order.

This sequence allows the attacker to profit from the price difference created by their own transactions, at the expense of the large transaction they sandwiched.

Historical Context and Previous Research

The concept of sandwich attacks gained significant attention after being systematically identified and analyzed by Zhou, Qin, et al. in 2021. Their research highlighted the vulnerabilities in Ethereum's transaction ordering and sparked further investigations into this exploitative strategy. Subsequent studies have explored various aspects of sandwich attacks, from their underlying mechanics to potential mitigation strategies, contributing to a growing body of literature on this topic.

Challenges in Detecting Sandwich Attacks

Miner Autonomy and Gas Fees

One of the primary challenges in detecting and preventing sandwich attacks lies in the autonomy of miners. Miners have the discretion to prioritize transactions based on Gas fees, which are paid by users to incentivize the inclusion of their transactions in the blockchain. Attackers exploit this by paying higher Gas fees to ensure their transactions are processed in a specific order, making it difficult to disrupt their strategy without significant changes to the transaction prioritization mechanism.

Transparency and Exploitation of Pending Transactions

The transparency of Ethereum's transaction pool, where pending transactions are visible to all participants, also plays a critical role in enabling sandwich attacks. Malicious actors can monitor this pool to identify opportunities for front-running and back-running, exploiting the time delay between when a transaction is broadcast and when it is actually included in the blockchain. This visibility allows attackers to strategically place their transactions around large pending orders, executing the sandwich attack with precision.

II. Related Work and Methodology

Existing Defense Mechanisms

Various defense mechanisms have been proposed to mitigate the impact of sandwich attacks and similar exploitative strategies in decentralized platforms like Ethereum. These mechanisms aim to enhance transaction security and protect users from financial losses caused by malicious activities.

Cryptographic Techniques

One approach to mitigating sandwich attacks involves the use of cryptographic techniques. These techniques focus on encrypting sensitive transaction data and ensuring that transaction details remain confidential until they are confirmed on the blockchain. By obscuring transaction intentions and details, cryptographic methods aim to reduce the visibility of transactions to potential attackers, thereby thwarting their ability to predict and manipulate market prices.

Transaction Partitioning

Transaction partitioning is another strategy that aims to minimize the impact of large transactions and reduce the opportunities for front-running and back-running. This technique involves splitting large transactions into smaller, less noticeable parts. By breaking down transactions, it becomes more challenging for attackers to identify and exploit large orders in the transaction pool. While effective in some cases, transaction partitioning can increase transaction costs and complexity for users.

Verification Fees

Implementing verification fees is a mechanism designed to discourage malicious behavior by requiring users to pay an additional fee for priority transaction processing. These fees are intended to incentivize miners to prioritize transactions with legitimate intentions over those driven purely by profit motives. However, setting appropriate verification fees requires careful consideration of transaction volume and market dynamics to avoid imposing unnecessary costs on users.

Slippage Tolerance Adjustments

Slippage tolerance adjustments involve modifying the parameters that govern price execution tolerance in Automated Market Makers (AMMs). By adjusting these parameters, platforms can reduce the impact of sudden price fluctuations caused by malicious transactions. This approach aims to maintain market stability and prevent attackers from exploiting price differentials through rapid and coordinated trading strategies.

Limitations of Current Solutions

While existing defense mechanisms provide valuable tools for mitigating sandwich attacks, they are not without limitations. Cryptographic techniques and transaction partitioning can increase transaction complexity and costs, potentially discouraging user participation. Verification fees must be carefully calibrated to balance security incentives with user accessibility. Additionally, slippage tolerance adjustments may mitigate some forms of exploitation but can also impact market liquidity and price efficiency.

GasTrace Framework

Cascade Classification Approach

To address the limitations of existing defense mechanisms, we propose GasTrace, a novel framework designed specifically to detect and mitigate sandwich attacks in Ethereum. GasTrace employs a cascade classification approach that leverages advanced machine learning techniques to analyze transaction features and identify suspicious activity associated with sandwich attacks.

Importance of Gas Features

GasTrace places particular emphasis on Gas features, which play a critical role in Ethereum's transaction processing and prioritization mechanism. By analyzing Gas-related metrics, such as Gas fees and transaction execution times, GasTrace can identify anomalies indicative of front-running and back-running strategies used in sandwich attacks.

Initial Classification (R1 Stage)

In the initial stage of GasTrace, we perform feature selection and compilation to create a comprehensive dataset of transaction attributes relevant to detecting sandwich attacks. This initial dataset forms the basis for subsequent classification efforts.

Support Vector Machine (SVM) with Radial Basis Function (RBF) Kernel

GasTrace utilizes a Support Vector Machine (SVM) with a Radial Basis Function (RBF) Kernel in the R1 stage of classification. SVMs are well-suited for binary classification tasks and can effectively distinguish between malicious and legitimate transaction patterns based on the selected features.

Generation of Predictive Probabilities

During the R1 stage, GasTrace generates predictive probabilities for each account, reflecting the likelihood of involvement in sandwich attacks. These probabilities are instrumental in refining the feature set and preparing data for further analysis in subsequent stages.

Node Network Construction

Integration of Predictive Probabilities

The predictive probabilities generated in the R1 stage are integrated into a node network representation. Each node in the network corresponds to an Ethereum account, and the network structure encapsulates the relationships between accounts based on transaction behaviors and attributes.

Node Representation and Features

Nodes in the GasTrace network are characterized by enriched feature sets that incorporate predictive probabilities and additional transactional attributes. This holistic approach enables GasTrace to capture nuanced patterns of suspicious behavior associated with sandwich attacks.

Second Classification (R2 Stage)

Graph Attention Network (GAT) Model

In the R2 stage, GasTrace employs a Graph Attention Network (GAT) model to perform detailed behavioral analysis of accounts within the constructed node network. GATs are particularly effective for learning complex relationships and dependencies between nodes in graph-based data structures, making them well-suited for identifying subtle deviations indicative of malicious intent.

Behavioral Analysis of Accounts

By leveraging the GAT model, GasTrace can identify behavioral discrepancies and anomalies that signal potential involvement in sandwich attacks. This comprehensive analysis enhances the accuracy and reliability of detecting malicious accounts, thereby strengthening Ethereum's security infrastructure.

III. Experimental Results

Dataset and Experimental Setup

Data Collection and Preparation

For our experimental evaluation of GasTrace, we curated a dataset comprising 1,834 Ethereum transactions. The dataset was carefully selected to include a diverse range of transaction types and scenarios, ensuring comprehensive coverage of potential sandwich attack patterns. Each transaction in the dataset was meticulously annotated with relevant attributes, including Gas fees, transaction timestamps, and transaction sizes.

Experimental Parameters

The experimental setup for evaluating GasTrace involved defining and optimizing several key parameters to ensure robust performance and generalizability:

- Feature Selection: We identified and selected essential features related to Gas usage, transaction timing, and other relevant transactional metrics crucial for detecting sandwich attacks.

- Model Training: GasTrace's classification models, including the SVM with RBF kernel in the R1 stage and the GAT model in the R2 stage, were trained using a subset of the dataset.

- Validation Strategy: To validate the effectiveness of GasTrace, we employed cross-validation techniques and partitioned the dataset into training and testing sets. This approach helped assess the model's performance on unseen data and mitigate overfitting.

Performance Evaluation

Accuracy and F1 Score

GasTrace demonstrated outstanding performance in detecting malicious accounts involved in sandwich attacks:

- Accuracy: GasTrace achieved an accuracy of 96.73%, indicating its ability to correctly classify transactions as either benign or suspicious with high confidence.

- F1 Score: The F1 score, a harmonic mean of precision and recall, was calculated at 95.71%. This metric underscores GasTrace's robustness in both identifying true positives (malicious transactions) and minimizing false positives.

Comparison with Existing Methods

GasTrace's performance was benchmarked against traditional defense mechanisms and state-of-the-art detection strategies for sandwich attacks:

- Superiority: Compared to existing methods, GasTrace consistently outperformed in terms of accuracy and F1 score. Its innovative use of Gas features and advanced classification techniques enabled more precise and reliable detection of malicious behaviors.

Discussion of Results

Insights and Implications

The experimental results underscore GasTrace's efficacy in addressing the unique challenges posed by sandwich attacks in Ethereum. By leveraging Gas-related metrics and sophisticated machine learning models, GasTrace effectively identifies and mitigates potential threats to transaction integrity and market fairness.

Limitations and Future Work

While GasTrace has demonstrated promising results, several limitations and opportunities for future research should be considered:

- Scalability: Further testing on larger datasets and under varying market conditions is necessary to validate GasTrace's scalability and applicability in real-time environments.

- Adaptability: Continuous updates and refinements to GasTrace's feature selection and model architectures are essential to adapt to evolving attack strategies and transaction patterns.

- Integration: Collaborative efforts with Ethereum developers and stakeholders are crucial to integrate GasTrace into existing blockchain infrastructure seamlessly.

IV. Future Works

Summary of Contributions

Framework and Methodology

GasTrace introduces a novel framework for detecting and mitigating sandwich attacks in Ethereum, leveraging advanced machine learning techniques and Gas-related metrics. The cascade classification approach and node network construction provide a structured methodology to identify malicious behaviors with high accuracy.

Experimental Findings

Experimental results validate GasTrace's effectiveness in detecting sandwich attack malicious accounts, achieving remarkable accuracy and F1 score metrics. These findings underscore GasTrace's potential to enhance transaction security and mitigate financial risks in decentralized platforms.

Future Directions

Potential Improvements

Moving forward, several avenues for improvement and refinement of GasTrace can be explored:

- Enhanced Feature Selection: Continuously refining the selection of Gas-related features and incorporating additional transactional attributes could improve detection accuracy and adaptability to evolving attack strategies.

- Advanced Machine Learning Models: Exploring the integration of more advanced machine learning models beyond SVM and GAT could enhance GasTrace's capability to discern subtle patterns of malicious behavior.

- Real-Time Detection: Developing real-time detection capabilities to mitigate sandwich attacks as they occur, rather than post-hoc analysis, is crucial for proactive defense in dynamic blockchain environments.

- Community Engagement: Collaborating with Ethereum developers and stakeholders to gather real-world insights and feedback, ensuring GasTrace's relevance and usability in practical settings.

Broader Applications

GasTrace's methodologies and findings extend beyond sandwich attacks, offering a foundation for detecting and mitigating various forms of malicious activities in blockchain ecosystems. By generalizing its approach, GasTrace can contribute to broader cybersecurity efforts within decentralized finance (DeFi) and digital asset markets.

V. Appendices

Detailed Mathematical Formulations

In the appendices, we provide detailed mathematical formulations that underpin the algorithms and methodologies used in GasTrace. These formulations include:

- Support Vector Machine (SVM) with Radial Basis Function (RBF) Kernel: A comprehensive explanation of how SVMs with RBF kernels are utilized in GasTrace for the initial classification (R1 stage). This section covers the mathematical principles of SVMs and the specific parameters tuned for optimal performance in detecting sandwich attacks.

- Graph Attention Network (GAT) Model: An in-depth exploration of the Graph Attention Network model employed in the second classification (R2 stage). This includes the mathematical foundations of attention mechanisms within graphs and how GATs are adapted to analyze transactional behaviors and detect anomalous patterns indicative of malicious activity.

Additional Experimental Data

GasTrace's appendices also include supplementary experimental data that further validate the framework's performance and robustness. This data encompasses:

- Extended Dataset Description: Detailed characteristics of the dataset used in GasTrace's evaluation, including transaction types, timestamps, Gas fees, and transaction sizes. This comprehensive dataset provides insights into the diversity and complexity of transactions analyzed.

- Performance Metrics: Additional performance metrics beyond accuracy and F1 score, such as precision, recall, and ROC curves, to offer a comprehensive assessment of GasTrace's detection capabilities across various evaluation criteria.

Implementation Details

GasTrace's implementation details are documented in the appendices, outlining:

- Software Architecture: A high-level overview of the software architecture used to develop and deploy GasTrace, including the integration of machine learning libraries, data preprocessing pipelines, and model training frameworks.

- Code Repository: Access to the open-source repository housing GasTrace's implementation code, facilitating transparency, reproducibility, and community contributions. The repository includes instructions for installation, usage guidelines, and ongoing updates based on feedback and further developments.

Data Availability

GasTrace ensures transparency and accessibility by providing access to anonymized transaction data used in the experiments. This promotes reproducibility of results and encourages collaborative efforts in advancing blockchain security research.

Conclusion

GasTrace represents a significant advancement in detecting and mitigating sandwich attack malicious accounts in Ethereum. By combining innovative methodologies with rigorous experimental validation, GasTrace offers a robust solution to enhance transaction security and uphold the integrity of decentralized platforms. As blockchain technologies continue to evolve, GasTrace's framework provides a foundation for proactive defense against emerging threats, ensuring a safer and more resilient ecosystem for users and developers alike.

About Orochi Network

Orochi Network is a cutting-edge zkOS (An operating system based on zero-knowledge proof) designed to tackle the challenges of computation limitation, data correctness, and data availability in the Web3 industry. With the well-rounded solutions for Web3 Applications, Orochi Network omits the current performance-related barriers and makes ways for more comprehensive dApps hence, becoming the backbone of Web3's infrastructure landscape.

Blog