Dynamics of Crypto Business Models in 2024
Table of Contents
In cryptocurrency, various business models have emerged, each vying for a sustainable product-market fit. Among these, the sale of block space has proven to be a cornerstone, shaping the economic dynamics of blockchain networks. In this article, we dive into the block space as a business model and explore its market dynamics and future implications.
I. Understanding Block Space as a Business Model
The core economic model of blockchains has recently come into sharper focus, revealing the pivotal role played by the sale of block space. Unlike traditional business models, where products or services are the primary commodities, block space represents a specialized compute resource sold at regular intervals—every 12 seconds, to be precise. This section will dissect the intricacies of block space as a business model, shedding light on its unique characteristics and its effectiveness in achieving repeatable product-market fit within the crypto ecosystem.
Achieving Repeatable Product-Market Fit in Crypto
In the rapidly evolving landscape of cryptocurrencies, achieving product-market fit is a formidable challenge. However, certain business models have demonstrated remarkable resilience, and the sale of block space is emerging as a frontrunner. Its recurrent nature, with consumers purchasing this commodity every 12 seconds, signifies a level of consistency that is often elusive in the volatile world of crypto.
Evaluating the Sale of Block Space
To truly understand the significance of block space, it's essential to evaluate it as a product. This commodity, in essence, is a specialized compute resource that operates on a per-operation basis. Beyond the technicalities, the fees paid for block space become a critical market demand signal, providing insights into the broader dynamics of blockchain networks.
Specialty Commodity Compute Resource
Block space, in its essence, represents a unique commodity within the crypto landscape. It is not merely a transactional medium but a specialized compute resource tailored to meet the demands of decentralized applications (DApps), smart contracts, and various other functionalities across diverse blockchain networks.
Per Operation Basis
The sale of block space is distinctly different from traditional business models, particularly in its pricing structure. Operating on a per-operation basis, users pay for the computational resources required for each transaction or operation conducted on the blockchain. This granular approach to pricing aligns with the decentralized and transparent nature of blockchain networks.
Market Demand Signal through "Fees Paid"
The crux of understanding block space as a business model lies in comprehending the significance of "Fees Paid." Beyond being a transactional cost, fees paid for block space serve as a potent market demand signal. This metric reflects the economic health of a blockchain network, acting as a barometer for user engagement, application deployment, and overall network vitality.
Source: Blockspace - Polkadot
II. Market Dynamics and Trends
As we unravel the layers of crypto business models, a critical examination of market dynamics and trends surrounding the sale of block space becomes imperative. This section delves into key metrics, explores the network effects shaping block space, analyzes market dynamics, and unveils the intriguing fee multiples that govern the cryptocurrency market.
Fees Paid Metrics
Understanding the metrics associated with "Fees Paid" provides a nuanced perspective on the health and vibrancy of blockchain networks. This section delves into the 30-day or 90-day annualized fees paid, revealing fascinating insights into user activity, demand for block space, and the economic value generated within different blockchain ecosystems. For instance, users contribute substantial amounts, ranging from millions to thousands of dollars, to access block space on prominent networks such as Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain (BSC), Arbitrum, Optimism, and StarkNet.
Network Effects and Block Space
Block space, as a commodity, exhibits enduring demand-side network effects that create formidable moats around successful blockchain networks. These effects manifest in various dimensions, including developer engagement, application deployments, user participation, capital influx, and liquidity. Examining these network effects provides a comprehensive view of the competitive landscape, elucidating the factors that contribute to the dominance or evolution of specific blockchain networks.
Block Space Market Dynamics
The market share for block space is a dynamic landscape that undergoes shifts and rotations. Ethereum, once the undisputed leader with a 91% market share in 2021, has seen a marginal decline to 87%. Noteworthy trends include the emergence of Alt Layer 1 (Avalanche, Polygon) and Layer 2 Rollup (Arbitrum, Optimism) networks, both experiencing remarkable year-over-year growth in fees paid. This analysis sheds light on the adaptability and responsiveness of the market to emerging blockchain technologies.
Fee Multiples and Market Dynamics
An intriguing facet of market dynamics is the "Fee Multiple," where the market assigns different credit values for transaction fees to various blockchain networks. Ethereum, despite its prominence, receives a lower fee multiple compared to networks like Avalanche. This indicates the market's perception of the value generated by each dollar of transaction fees on different blockchain platforms. The variations in fee multiples present a compelling lens through which to assess the relative strengths and weaknesses of different networks.
Comparative Analysis of L1s and L2s
This section extends beyond individual blockchain networks to explore the broader landscape of Layer 1 (L1) and Layer 2 (L2) solutions. It dissects the unique characteristics of L1s, such as Ethereum, which operate with fixed daily incentives to maintain sybil-resistance mechanisms, resulting in fixed costs and variable margins. In contrast, L2s, particularly Rollups, exhibit floating costs dependent on transaction demand but offer fixed gross margins. The comparative analysis sets the stage for predicting the repricing of L2s against L1s over time, considering factors like margins, scalability, and capacity constraints.
Source: L2fees.info
III. L1s vs. L2s Business Models
The comparative analysis of Layer 1 (L1) and Layer 2 (L2) blockchains delves into the nuanced intricacies that distinguish these fundamental components of the crypto ecosystem. Understanding the structural disparities in their business models, cost structures, and operational dynamics is crucial for discerning the future trajectory of blockchain networks.
Comparative Analysis of L1s and L2s
Layer 1 blockchains, exemplified by Ethereum, employ a distinctive approach characterized by fixed daily incentives. These incentives are designed to establish a sybil-resistance mechanism, crucial for maintaining consensus within the network. Consequently, L1s exhibit a cost structure with fixed operational expenses and variable margins. Notably, monthly gross margins for L1s have demonstrated considerable fluctuation, ranging from 2% to 60% since the beginning of January 2023.
Source: Will Nuelle - Galaxy Ventures
L1s: Sybil-Resistance Mechanism and Cost Dynamics
The core operational mechanism of L1s revolves around maintaining a sybil-resistance mechanism. This process demands fixed daily incentives, resulting in a cost structure with a fixed cost of goods sold (COGS) and a floating gross margin. The variability in gross margins over time underscores the challenges and complexities associated with sustaining L1 networks, where operational costs are relatively constant, but revenue fluctuates based on transaction volume and demand.
Comparative Analysis of L2s
Contrastingly, Layer 2 solutions, particularly Rollups, introduce a distinct paradigm with floating COGS. The amount spent on computational data (calldata) is intricately tied to transaction demand, offering a responsive and adaptive cost structure. L2s maintain a fixed gross margin, hovering around 25% throughout the year. Noteworthy innovations, such as EIP-4844 and developments like Blobstream from CelestiaOrg, hold the promise of elevating L2 gross margins to even higher levels, potentially reaching up to 70%.
Prediction: Repricing of L2s vs. L1s
Building upon the observed dynamics, a compelling prediction emerges — the repricing of Layer 2 solutions relative to Layer 1 networks over time. Layer 2 networks, boasting margins exceeding 75%, face no immediate scalability obstacles. While L2s are often considered commodities, the prediction emphasizes that top-tier Layer 2 solutions will wield network effects, positioning them favorably against Layer 1 counterparts.
L2s: Margins and Scalability
Layer 2 solutions, characterized by robust margins exceeding 75%, emerge as commodities in the crypto space. The absence of immediate scalability hurdles positions top-tier L2s as formidable players, not only in terms of efficiency but also in their potential to cultivate and capitalize on network effects. The network effects become a crucial differentiator, influencing developers, application deployments, user participation, capital influx, and overall liquidity.
L1s: Margins and Capacity Constraints
Conversely, Layer 1 networks grapple with narrower profit margins, ranging between 33% to 50%, coupled with inherent capacity constraints. The limitations imposed by hard capacity constraints present challenges for L1 networks seeking to accommodate the growing demand for transaction throughput.
IV. Further Thoughts and Implications
Beyond the quantitative metrics and comparative analyses lies a deeper exploration of the philosophical underpinnings and implications of crypto business models. This section delves into the broader considerations surrounding the objectives of blockchain networks, the delicate balance between transaction affordability and vibrant ecosystems, and the transformative potential of networked ecosystems in shaping token utility.
The Cheapest Transactions vs. Vibrant Ecosystems
A fundamental debate within the crypto community revolves around the primary objective of blockchain networks. Is it to offer the cheapest transactions possible or to cultivate vibrant and thriving ecosystems? This dichotomy represents a philosophical crossroads, with proponents arguing that affordable transactions foster on-chain application ecosystems, while others contend that networked ecosystems, rich in applications and user engagement, elevate blockchain tokens to a status akin to traditional "money."
Networked Ecosystems and Token Utility
The emergence of networked ecosystems stands as a testament to the transformative potential of blockchain networks. These ecosystems, encompassing developers, applications, users, capital, and liquidity, have a profound impact on the utility of blockchain tokens. As applications flourish within a networked ecosystem, the native tokens associated with Layer 1 (L1) and Layer 2 (L2) solutions assume roles beyond mere transactional currencies, evolving into valuable assets with diverse use cases.
Fees Paid as a Demand Signal
In this complex landscape, the metric of "Fees Paid" emerges as a reliable and dynamic demand signal. Beyond its function as a transactional cost, "Fees Paid" serves as a barometer for the vibrancy and demand within blockchain networks. The robustness of application ecosystems, the engagement of users, and the overall health of the network are encapsulated in this singular metric, making it a potent indicator for assessing the success and potential of different blockchain solutions.
Implications for the Future of Crypto Business Models
The broader considerations outlined in this section reverberate across the crypto industry, offering insights into the trajectory of future business models. Not every Layer 1 token can serve as "money," and the utility of native tokens is increasingly tied to the vibrancy of their associated application ecosystems. As the industry matures, the role of "Fees Paid" as a demand signal becomes more pronounced, providing a reliable metric for gauging the effectiveness and relevance of different blockchain networks.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the sale of block space emerges as a pivotal business model in the crypto realm, shaping the future of blockchain networks. As the industry continues to evolve, understanding the dynamics of block space becomes crucial for businesses and developers alike. The landscape is dynamic, and the choices made today will undoubtedly influence the trajectory of crypto business models in the years to come.
About Orochi Network
Orochi Network is a cutting-edge zkOS (An operating system based on zero-knowledge proof) designed to tackle the challenges of computation limitation, data correctness, and data availability in the Web3 industry. With the well-rounded solutions for Web3 Applications, Orochi Network omits the current performance-related barriers and makes ways for more comprehensive dApps hence, becoming the backbone of Web3's infrastructure landscape.
Categories
Event Recap
3
Misc
56
Monthly Report
1
Oracles
4
Orand
3
Orosign
19
Partnership
20
Verifiable Random Function
9
Web3
86
Zero-Knowledge Proofs
35
Top Posts
1
Introducing Orochi Network - The Operating System For High Performance dApp And Metaverse
10 January 2023
2
Orosign Wallet 101: How to get started?
03 February 2023
3
Validity Proofs vs. Fraud Proofs: An Explanation
06 January 2023
4
Introducing Orosign Multisignature Wallet - A Self-Managing Mobile App For Digital Assets
06 January 2023
5
Introducing X-ORO Points: Opportunity to jump into Orochi Network's Token Whitelist
22 March 2024
6
Discovering the Orochi Retroactive Adventure: Origin, Oro Wild, and Oro Futuristic
21 March 2024
7
Introducing Orand: Your Trustless Source of Randomness
20 February 2023
8
Compete, Connect, Conquer: Orochi Network's Leaderboard Challenge Begins
01 April 2024
Tag
Orand
NFT
Misc
Web3
Partnership Announcement
Layer 2
Event Recap
Immutable Ledger
Oracles
Verifiable Random Function
Zero-Knowledge Proofs
Multisignature Wallet
